Native Language and Dialect

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Revision as of 16:17, 2 February 2022 by Seiyon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Naismith et al. (2018) http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/40665/1/EDM2018_paper_37.pdf pdf * a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora * Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish. * When New General Service List(NGSL) is used on Pitt English Language Institute Corpus(PELIC), Level 5 Ar...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Naismith et al. (2018) [pdf]

  • a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
  • Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
  • When New General Service List(NGSL) is used on Pitt English Language Institute Corpus(PELIC), Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are unfairly evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
  • When used on ETS corpus, “high”-labeled essays by Japanese-speaking learners are rater significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.