Difference between revisions of "Student Knowledge Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fixed broken link) |
(new) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion | *Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion | ||
*Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students | *Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students | ||
Almoubayyed et al. (2023) [https://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2023/proceedings/2023.EDM-long-papers.18/2023.EDM-long-papers.18.pdf pdf] | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 17 August 2023
Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf
- Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
- Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
- Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
Almoubayyed et al. (2023) pdf