Difference between revisions of "Latino/Latina/Latinx/Hispanic Learners in North America"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Anderson et al. (2019) [https://www.upenn.edu/learninganalytics/ryanbaker/EDM2019_paper56.pdf pdf]
Anderson et al. (2019) [https://www.upenn.edu/learninganalytics/ryanbaker/EDM2019_paper56.pdf pdf]
* Models predicting six-year college graduation
* Models predicting six-year college graduation
* Algorithms had higher false positive rates for White students and higher false negative rates for Latino students.
* Algorithms showed higher false negative rates for Latino students while showing higher false positive rates for White students.
 
Lee and Kizilcec (2020) [[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.00088.pdf pdf]]
* Model predicting college course grade of median or above
* Out-of-the-box random forest model violates demographic parity and equality of opportunity for URM(underrepresented minority: American Indian, Black, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Multicultural) than for non-URM students (White and Asian)

Revision as of 00:17, 24 January 2022

Anderson et al. (2019) pdf

  • Models predicting six-year college graduation
  • Algorithms showed higher false negative rates for Latino students while showing higher false positive rates for White students.