Difference between revisions of "Native Language and Dialect"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
Naismith et al. (2018) [[http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/40665/1/EDM2018_paper_37.pdf pdf]]
Naismith et al. (2018) [[http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/40665/1/EDM2018_paper_37.pdf pdf]]
* a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
* a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
* Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
* Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
* When New General Service List(NGSL) is used on Pitt English Language Institute Corpus(PELIC), Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are unfairly evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
* Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are unfairly evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
* When used on ETS corpus, “high”-labeled essays by Japanese-speaking learners are rater significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.
* When used on ETS corpus, “high”-labeled essays by Japanese-speaking learners are rated significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.
 
*




Loukina et al. (2019) [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ets2.12170 pdf]]
Loukina et al. (2019) [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ets2.12170 pdf]]

Revision as of 04:21, 3 February 2022

Naismith et al. (2018) [pdf]

  • a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
  • Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
  • Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are unfairly evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
  • When used on ETS corpus, “high”-labeled essays by Japanese-speaking learners are rated significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.


Loukina et al. (2019) [pdf]