Difference between revisions of "Course Grade and GPA Prediction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Riazy et al. (2020) [[https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2020/93241/93241.pdf pdf]] | Riazy et al. (2020) [[https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2020/93241/93241.pdf pdf]] | ||
* | * Models predicting course outcome of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE) | ||
* | * Students with self-declared disability were predicted to pass the course with 16-23 percentage points in favor from the training and test set | ||
Revision as of 00:54, 17 February 2022
Lee and Kizilcec (2020) [pdf]
- Model predicting college course grade of median or above
- Out-of-the-box random forest model violates demographic parity and equality of opportunity for URM (underrepresented minority: American Indian, Black, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic, and Multicultural) than for non-URM students (White and Asian)
Yu et al. (2020) [pdf]
- Model predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA
- students of several racial backgrounds were inaccurately predicted to perform worse than other students
Riazy et al. (2020) [pdf]
- Models predicting course outcome of students in a virtual learning environment (VLE)
- Students with self-declared disability were predicted to pass the course with 16-23 percentage points in favor from the training and test set