Difference between revisions of "Student Knowledge Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(addition) |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Models discovering generalization of the performance for reading comprehension ability in the context of middle school students’ usage of Carnegie Learning’s ITS for mathematics instruction | * Models discovering generalization of the performance for reading comprehension ability in the context of middle school students’ usage of Carnegie Learning’s ITS for mathematics instruction | ||
* Model trained on smaller | * Model trained on smaller dataset achieves greater fairness in prediction for male/female as well as white/non-white students | ||
* For model trained on | * For model trained on larger dataset, prediction is more accurate for white and female students than non-white and male students. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:06, 17 August 2023
Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf
- Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
- Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
- Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
Almoubayyed et al. (2023) pdf
- Models discovering generalization of the performance for reading comprehension ability in the context of middle school students’ usage of Carnegie Learning’s ITS for mathematics instruction
- Model trained on smaller dataset achieves greater fairness in prediction for male/female as well as white/non-white students
- For model trained on larger dataset, prediction is more accurate for white and female students than non-white and male students.