Difference between revisions of "Other NLP Applications of Algorithms in Education"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added Sha et al (2021)) |
m |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* Models predicting a MOOC discussion forum post is content-relevant or content-irrelevant | * Models predicting a MOOC discussion forum post is content-relevant or content-irrelevant | ||
* MOOCs taught in English | * MOOCs taught in English | ||
* Some algorithms achieved ABROCA under 0.01 for female students versus male students, | * Some algorithms achieved ABROCA under 0.01 for female students versus male students, but other algorithms (Naive Bayes) had ABROCA as high as 0.06 | ||
but other algorithms (Naive Bayes) had ABROCA as high as 0.06 | |||
* ABROCA varied from 0.03 to 0.08 for non-native speakers of English versus native speakers | * ABROCA varied from 0.03 to 0.08 for non-native speakers of English versus native speakers | ||
* Balancing the size of each group in the training set reduced ABROCA values | * Balancing the size of each group in the training set reduced ABROCA values |
Revision as of 11:22, 4 July 2022
Naismith et al. (2018) pdf
- a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
- Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
- Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are unfairly evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
- When used on ETS corpus, “high”-labeled essays by Japanese-speaking learners are rated significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.
Samei et al. (2015) pdf
- Models predicting classroom discourse properties (e.g. authenticity and uptake)
- Model trained on urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.60) performed with similar accuracy when tested on non-urban students (authenticity: 0.62, uptake: 0.62)
- Model trained on non-urban (authenticity: 0.61, uptake: 0.59) performed with similar accuracy when tested on urban students (authenticity: 0.60, uptake: 0.63)
Sha et al. (2021) pdf
- Models predicting a MOOC discussion forum post is content-relevant or content-irrelevant
- MOOCs taught in English
- Some algorithms achieved ABROCA under 0.01 for female students versus male students, but other algorithms (Naive Bayes) had ABROCA as high as 0.06
- ABROCA varied from 0.03 to 0.08 for non-native speakers of English versus native speakers
- Balancing the size of each group in the training set reduced ABROCA values