Difference between revisions of "At-risk/Dropout/Stopout/Graduation Prediction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Yu, Lee, and Kizilcec (2021)[[https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3430895.3460139 pdf]] | Yu, Lee, and Kizilcec (2021)[[https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3430895.3460139 pdf]] | ||
* Model predicting college dropout | * Model predicting college dropout | ||
Gardner, Brooks and Baker (2019) [[https://www.upenn.edu/learninganalytics/ryanbaker/LAK_PAPER97_CAMERA.pdf pdf]] | |||
* Model predicting MOOC dropout | |||
* Some algorithms studied performed worse for female students than male students. | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 24 January 2022
Hu and Rangwala (2020) pdf
- Models predicting if student at-risk for failing a course
- Several algorithms perform worse for African-American students
Kai et al. (2017) pdf
- Models predicting student retention in an online college program
- J48 decision trees achieved much lower Kappa and AUC for Black students than White students
- JRip decision rules achieved almost identical Kappa and AUC for Black students and White students
Anderson et al. (2019) pdf
- Models predicting six-year college graduation
- Performance for African-American students comparable to performance for students in other races.
Yu, Lee, and Kizilcec (2021)[pdf]
- Model predicting college dropout
Gardner, Brooks and Baker (2019) [pdf]
- Model predicting MOOC dropout
- Some algorithms studied performed worse for female students than male students.