Difference between revisions of "Socioeconomic Status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Students from low-income households were inaccurately predicted to perform worse for both short-term (final course grade) and long-term (GPA) | * Students from low-income households were inaccurately predicted to perform worse for both short-term (final course grade) and long-term (GPA) | ||
* Fairness of model improved if it included only clickstream and survey data | * Fairness of model improved if it included only clickstream and survey data | ||
Yu et al. (2021) [https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3430895.3460139 pdf] | |||
*Models predicting college dropout for students in residential and fully online program | |||
*Whether the socio-demographic information was included or not, the model showed worse accuracy and true negative rates for students with greater financial needs if they are studying in person | |||
*The model showed better recall for students with greater financial needs, especially for those studying in person |
Revision as of 09:23, 18 May 2022
Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf
- Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
- Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
- Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
Yu et al. (2020) pdf
- Models predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA
- Students from low-income households were inaccurately predicted to perform worse for both short-term (final course grade) and long-term (GPA)
- Fairness of model improved if it included only clickstream and survey data
Yu et al. (2021) pdf
- Models predicting college dropout for students in residential and fully online program
- Whether the socio-demographic information was included or not, the model showed worse accuracy and true negative rates for students with greater financial needs if they are studying in person
- The model showed better recall for students with greater financial needs, especially for those studying in person