Difference between revisions of "Native Language and Dialect"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Naismith et al. (2018) | Naismith et al. (2018) [http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/40665/1/EDM2018_paper_37.pdf pdf] | ||
* a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora | * a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora | ||
* Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of human-assessed English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish. | * Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of human-assessed English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Loukina et al. (2019) | Loukina et al. (2019) [https://aclanthology.org/W19-4401.pdf pdf] | ||
* Models providing automated speech scores on English language proficiency assessment | * Models providing automated speech scores on English language proficiency assessment | ||
* L1-specific model trained on the speaker’s native language was the least fair, especially for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean speakers, but not for German speakers | * L1-specific model trained on the speaker’s native language was the least fair, especially for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean speakers, but not for German speakers | ||
* All models (Baseline, Fair feature subset, L1-specific) performed disadvantageously for Japanese speakers | * All models (Baseline, Fair feature subset, L1-specific) performed disadvantageously for Japanese speakers | ||
Revision as of 19:56, 16 May 2022
Naismith et al. (2018) pdf
- a model that measures L2 learners’ lexical sophistication with the frequency list based on the native speaker corpora
- Arabic-speaking learners are rated systematically lower across all levels of human-assessed English proficiency than speakers of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Spanish.
- Level 5 Arabic-speaking learners are inaccurately evaluated to have similar level of lexical sophistication as Level 4 learners from China, Japan, Korean and Spain .
- When used on the ETS corpus, essays by Japanese-speaking learners with higher human-rated lexical sophistication are rated significantly lower in lexical sophistication than Arabic, Japanese, Korean and Spanish peers.
Loukina et al. (2019) pdf
- Models providing automated speech scores on English language proficiency assessment
- L1-specific model trained on the speaker’s native language was the least fair, especially for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean speakers, but not for German speakers
- All models (Baseline, Fair feature subset, L1-specific) performed disadvantageously for Japanese speakers