Difference between revisions of "Socioeconomic Status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Yudelson et al. (2014) [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.872&rep=rep1&type=pdf pdf] * Models structuring schools into reliably discernible groups * Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion * Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students") |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion | * Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion | ||
* Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students | * Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students | ||
Yu et al. (2020) [pdf] | |||
* Models predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA | |||
* Students from low-income households were inaccurately predicted to perform worse for both short-term (final course grade) and long-term (GPA) | |||
* Fairness of model improved if it included only clickstream and survey data |
Revision as of 07:43, 17 February 2022
Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf
- Models structuring schools into reliably discernible groups
- Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
- Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
Yu et al. (2020) [pdf]
- Models predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA
- Students from low-income households were inaccurately predicted to perform worse for both short-term (final course grade) and long-term (GPA)
- Fairness of model improved if it included only clickstream and survey data