Difference between revisions of "National and International Examination"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Baker et al. (2020) | Baker et al. (2020) [https://www.upenn.edu/learninganalytics/ryanbaker/BakerBerningGowda.pdf pdf] | ||
* Model predicting student graduation and SAT scores for military-connected students | * Model predicting student graduation and SAT scores for military-connected students | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Li et al. (2021) | Li et al. (2021) [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.15212.pdf pdf] | ||
*Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA | *Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA | ||
*Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova) | *Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova) | ||
Revision as of 07:24, 18 May 2022
Baker et al. (2020) pdf
- Model predicting student graduation and SAT scores for military-connected students
- For prediction of graduation, algorithms applying across population resulted an AUC of 0.60, degrading from their original performance of 70% or 71% to chance.
- For prediction of SAT scores, algorithms applying across population resulted in a Spearman's ρ of 0.42 and 0.44, degrading a third from their original performance to chance.
Li et al. (2021) pdf
- Model predicting student achievement on the standardized examination PISA
- Inaccuracy of the U.S.-trained model was greater for students from countries with lower scores of national development (e.g. Indonesia, Vietnam, Moldova)