Difference between revisions of "Student Knowledge Modeling"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Yudelson et al. (2014) [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.872&rep=rep1&type=pdf pdf]
Yudelson et al. (2014) [https://www.yudelson.info/pdf/EDM2014_YudelsonFRBNJ.pdf pdf]
*Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
*Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
*Models trained on schools with low, medium  proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
Almoubayyed et al. (2023) [https://educationaldatamining.org/EDM2023/proceedings/2023.EDM-long-papers.18/2023.EDM-long-papers.18.pdf pdf]


Models structuring schools into reliably discernible groups
* Models discovering generalization of the performance for reading comprehension ability in the context of middle school students’ usage of Carnegie Learning’s ITS for mathematics instruction
Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
* Model trained on smaller dataset achieves greater fairness in prediction for male/female as well as white/non-white students
Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students
* For model trained on larger dataset, prediction is more accurate for white and female students than non-white and male students.

Latest revision as of 12:06, 17 August 2023

Yudelson et al. (2014) pdf

  • Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
  • Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
  • Models trained on schools with low, medium proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students

Almoubayyed et al. (2023) pdf

  • Models discovering generalization of the performance for reading comprehension ability in the context of middle school students’ usage of Carnegie Learning’s ITS for mathematics instruction
  • Model trained on smaller dataset achieves greater fairness in prediction for male/female as well as white/non-white students
  • For model trained on larger dataset, prediction is more accurate for white and female students than non-white and male students.