Difference between revisions of "Short-term Performance and Learning Gains Prediction"

From Penn Center for Learning Analytics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edit for clarity on Ogan paper)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
*Multi-national models predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
*Multi-national models predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
*Models built on only U.S.or combined data sets performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
*Models built on only U.S.or combined data sets performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
*Models performed better when built on and applied for the dataset, except for Philippines which was outperformed slightly by U.S. model
*Models performed better when built on and applied for the same country, except for Philippines where model built on that country which was outperformed slightly by model built on U.S. data
 
 
Yudelson et al. (2014) [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.659.872&rep=rep1&type=pdf pdf]
 
* Models discovering generalizable sub-populations of students across different schools to predict students' learning with Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive Tutor (CLCT)
 
*Models trained on schools with a high proportion of low-SES student performed worse than those trained with medium or low proportion
*Models trained on schools with low, medium  proportion of SES students performed similarly well for schools with high proportions of low-SES students

Latest revision as of 05:23, 19 May 2022

Ogan et al. (2015) pdf

  • Multi-national models predicting learning gains from student's help-seeking behavior
  • Models built on only U.S.or combined data sets performed extremely poorly for Costa Rica
  • Models performed better when built on and applied for the same country, except for Philippines where model built on that country which was outperformed slightly by model built on U.S. data