Difference between revisions of "Parental Educational Background"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* J-48 decision trees achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attend college than those whose parents did | * J-48 decision trees achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attend college than those whose parents did | ||
* J-Rip decision rules achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attended college than those whose parents did | * J-Rip decision rules achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attended college than those whose parents did | ||
Yu et al. (2020) [[https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608066.pdf pdf]] | |||
*Models predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA | |||
* First-generation college students were inaccurately predicted to lower than class media final course grade and lower average GPA | |||
* Fairness of models improved with the inclusion of clickstream and survey data | |||
Revision as of 06:01, 17 February 2022
Kai et al. (2017) pdf
- Models predicting student retention in an online college program
- J-48 decision trees achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attend college than those whose parents did
- J-Rip decision rules achieved much higher Kappa and AUC for students whose parents did not attended college than those whose parents did
Yu et al. (2020) [pdf]
- Models predicting undergraduate course grades and average GPA
- First-generation college students were inaccurately predicted to lower than class media final course grade and lower average GPA
- Fairness of models improved with the inclusion of clickstream and survey data